About this site
One person, one commercial page, and editorial rules enforced by the build rather than by good intentions.
Who writes this
Alexey Lyubko, Fabric Developer. Writes and maintains the Microsoft Fabric course reviews on this site, and delivers private Fabric training for teams. Every course listed here is assessed on what it leaves you able to do afterwards, and every one carries a stated downside.
The public profile is at ru.linkedin.com/in/alyubko. Everything on this site is written by one named person rather than by a content team, which is worth stating in a category full of anonymous roundups.
How a course gets assessed
The same five questions, in the same order, for every entry.
What does it leave you able to do?
Not what it covers. Coverage is easy to list and tells you very little. A course that covers seven workloads in two days has listed them.
Which Fabric workloads does it genuinely teach?
Recorded as a field on every entry, drawn from 8 workloads. Fabric is many products wearing one name, so a course that teaches Data Factory and Power BI well and never opens a notebook is a good course and a bad match for an engineer.
What is the honest downside?
A required field. If an honest downside cannot be written, the entry does not go in. This is the single mechanism that keeps this file from drifting into advertising over time.
Who is it actually wrong for?
Recorded as best for, which is really a statement about who should not buy it. Most course pages answer this with everybody, which is another way of saying nobody in particular.
When was it last checked?
Per course, not per site. Fabric changes monthly, and a single site wide review date is a claim that stops being true within weeks of being made.
These are enforced, not intended. The dataset behind this site rejects an entry with a missing or trivially short downside, rejects a price label containing a currency figure, rejects an unknown workload, and rejects a missing review date. The build fails rather than publishing. That is a deliberate choice: editorial standards that depend on remembering them do not survive eighteen months.
What this site deliberately does not do
- No tutorials. Microsoft Learn publishes free, thorough, constantly updated documentation for every how to question in Fabric. A worse version of it would waste everybody's time.
- No prices. They move too fast to be responsibly quoted. Pricing models are described instead.
- No copied ratings. Where a platform publishes a score, read it there. It is not repeated here and never appears in structured data.
- No sponsored entries. There is no mechanism to pay to appear on this site, and no provider has been consulted about what is written about them.
- No unattributed content. One named author, on every page, with a profile you can check.
Verify anything decision critical. Certification codes, exam fees, renewal rules, licensing tiers and platform pricing all change, sometimes quickly. Check Microsoft Learn directly rather than trusting any third party roundup, including this one. Where something here turns out to be wrong, it will be corrected, but the correction will always arrive after the change.
Corrections and contact
Currently reviewing 18 Fabric training options. Site last reviewed 2026-08-27.
If something here is wrong, particularly if it is wrong about a course you run, the enquiry form on the team training page reaches the same inbox and corrections are made without argument where they are right. Providers are welcome to point out inaccuracies. They are not able to influence the assessment, and asking will be noted in the entry.
This site takes no affiliate commission on any course listed. Outbound links to providers are marked nofollow.
Questions about this site
Do you take affiliate commission?
No, on anything. There is no affiliate relationship with any provider listed on this site, no sponsored placement, and no paid inclusion. Every outbound link on every page is marked nofollow. This costs a revenue line that most sites in this category take, and it is the reason the downsides here are specific rather than decorative.
How do you make money then?
One page: private team training. That is the only commercial offering, it is disclosed on every page that touches it, and it is deliberately kept separate from the reviews. If the reviews also earned commission, every downside written on them would be worth doubting.
Why are there no prices on this site?
Because they change weekly and a page of figures that were true last quarter is worse than a page with none. Each course describes its pricing model instead. The dataset actively rejects a price label containing a currency figure, so this is enforced rather than intended.
Why are there no star ratings?
Two reasons. Copying another platform's aggregate score and presenting it as an independent assessment is dishonest. And emitting somebody else's rating as your own aggregateRating structured data is a spam pattern that earns site wide penalties. The build refuses to output it.
How often is this updated?
Each course carries its own review date, shown on its card, because Fabric ships meaningful changes monthly and a single site wide date stops being credible quickly. Anything older than about six months should be treated as needing verification.
How do I report something wrong?
Use the form on the team training page, which reaches the same inbox. Corrections are welcome and are made without argument where the correction is right. Anything factual that turns out to be wrong gets fixed and the review date on that entry is reset.